Consultative Framework of Experts and Scientific Independence

1. Purpose and transversal scope

This methodological framework governs the way in which William Guindon and his site base their analyzes and assertions of a scientific and technical nature within the framework of the SEM-26-003 submission, international representations (CCE, UN), open letters, public interventions and documentary publications.

William Guindon, as a citizen, student and submitter of the international citizen communication SEM-26-003 to the Commission de coopération environnementale (CCE / ACEUM (Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement)), does not present himself as a scientist. The issues addressed (protection of Grande Tourbière de Blainville (Great Blainville Peat Bog), management of hazardous materials, hydrogeology, ecotoxicology of cadmium) require absolute methodological rigor and the support of verifiable primary sources.

2. Principles of scientific independence

1. Scientific data and conclusions are reported faithfully, without distortion, and referenced (studies, public reports, standards, methodological measurements).
2. The opinion of an expert is distinguished from the facts and presented as such.
3. The site does not solicit paid advice conditional on a pre-established conclusion. The experts consulted are for their competence, with disclosure of links of interest where applicable.
4. William does not receive scientific instruction from any party (neither business, nor government, nor interest group).
5. In the event of scientific uncertainty, this is recognized; the site avoids false balance and misleading presentation.

3. Types of expertise consulted

The site can consult, according to needs:

• scientists and researchers (biology, ecology, hydrology, toxicology, public health, environmental law);
• public and independent organizations, recognized associations;
• legal experts (lawyers from the Quebec Bar);
• statisticians and specialists capable of validating the measurements and their reading.

4. Technical proofreading and legal advice

When an article relies heavily on scientific data or on an allegation of non-compliance with a standard, William strives to have the article (or its technical aspects) proofread by a competent expert, before publication, in order to reduce the risk of error.

A rereading by an expert does not transform William into an expert nor the article into a scientific publication, but strengthens its reliability.

5. Editorial independence

Consultation of experts does not entail any transfer of editorial control: the choices of angle, wording and publication remain those of William, under the supervision of his parents.

This framework is a standalone policy of williamguindon.me. No signature is required.